Tantalus - the online coin registry

Go Back   Tantalus Online Coin Registry > Coins > Roman Coins
 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-03-2006, 11:22 AM
rasiel rasiel is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 276
Default Roman coins in the headlines

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releas...-ate030306.php

i was surprised to this considering that technical analyses of denarii have been done before. more importantly, while this study does not specify whether the dating of the coins themselves will play any part in the study this is exactly what has been done before to show the gradual debasement of the coins from the time of nero onwards. the passing reference to drilling to get past the "treated surface" sounds like they're talking about silvered ants rather than denarii as (that i know of) proper denarii should show no significant deviation of the purity of the metal from surface to core. on the other hand this would still be a good idea to not unintentionally sample surface contaminants acquired through wear or corrosion.


ras
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-13-2007, 07:17 PM
Republic1 Republic1 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2
Default Re- Roman coins in the headlines.

Hi Ras,
I have not seen the article myself, however, I would like to add a little ditty or two for you to comment on. As you say, it sounds as if they are talking about the coinage of the "Empire". i.e. silvered antoninnianus, follis etc.
But what of the "Republic"? I think the same debasement was abound. What of the denarius known as "The Fourree"? As far as I am led to believe, this was a piece of bronze totally clad in silver, and then struck as a denarius proper. These fourree types of denarius are fairly plentiful, and I have seen examples dating as far back as 131 bc. A few examples, L. Postumius Albinus, T. Cloelius 128 bc, C. Porcius Cato 123 bc, L. Flaminius Chilo 109-108 bc, C. Servilius 82-80 bc, and there are plenty more. As you quite rightly say, a true denarius should show no deviation in purity.
In conclusion and my opinion, any denarius that has a porous looking surface, or a flaking (plated) look about it, is a definite no go. Leave well alone. As for drilling or cutting into the coin, they must be mad! Whatever happened to x-ray or spectrograph analisys?
An interesting discussion item. I hope I have given a little help towards the topic.

regards,
Jerry.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Dirty Old Coins, LLC